Ira Neebest and The First Coming
(seeking publication)
Ira Neebest and The First Coming is an unconventional story of love and suspense that can best be described as unusual, thought provoking and both light and dark at times … but uplifting in the end.
Ira Neebest, Hasidic Jew turned atheist, struggles with orthodox Judaism, devout Christianity and fanatic Islam, a struggle propelling him along a prophetic journey that ends in Jerusalem. The world is at the brink of annihilation as the Jews and the Muslims continue to rattle their nuclear swords with the dreaded expectation that metal will melt into mushroom clouds. Along his journey, Ira is awarded the Pulitzer and Nobel Prizes for The First Coming, a novel that blasphemes all three religions and places his life within the crosshairs of Islamic hatred.
This tale also tells of Ira’s troubled mother Rebecca (raised an orthodox Jew) and the deep seated guilt thrust upon her by an unrelenting rabbi—and of his wife Natale (the love of his life), who must deal with the demons thrust upon her by a Catholic past. Throughout Ira’s life, Soma Nole serves as a mother figure and friend. She is a wise but mysterious old woman, an eccentric elder who never seems to age as she travels the world over on a moment’s notice with the ability to speak as many languages as the places she visits.
Ira Neebest and The First Coming is a story that is relevant to our times, in the world we live in, a world held captive and seemingly battered into submission, day after day, by religious fanatics. There are many great books of non-fiction that confirm this, books written by Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, to name a few, books that rely on historical data and well grounded philosophical thought. Ira Neebest takes a different approach. It reasserts those most important issues that Harris and the others have raised, but wraps them in literature with plots and subplots, and imagery. It shows how average people, the characters, are affected by their beliefs or their non-beliefs in a god and religion and how they respond to both, again wrapped in literature and not bundled in statistics and past genocides that appear merely as black ink on page after page. This novel forces the readers to see the flesh and blood of Ira Neebest dripping from the pages into their own laps as he deals with the religious orthodoxy that surrounds and affects him.
Cast List/Descriptions
Rudy Oliver - TV Reporter
Jody Greenstreet - Clerk/Bailiff
Francis Hart - Judge
Leslie LaRue - Prosecution Attorney
Dale Lane - Prosecution Attorney
Connie Johnson - Prosecution Attorney
Terry Stone - Defense Attorney
Alex Rhodes - Defense Attorney
Regina Brinwaller - Police Officer at the scene and State Witness
Avery Summers - Resident at the scene and State Witness
Lonnie Jacobsen - One of the “Fearsome Five” and State Witness
Peter Lambert - Shot by Max Cooper and State Witness

Kelly Traveena - Botanical garden docent and. State Witness

Gilbert Grover - Gun shop owner
Val Baker - Gun expert and State Witness


Carrie Brubaker - Max Cooper's neighbor and State Witness
Nolan Hinkle - Friend to Max and Savannah and. State Witness
Loren Winer - Gun Training Expert and Defense Witness
Betty Doolittle - Savannah’s best friend and Defense Witness
Savannah Gregg Cooper - Max’s flirtatious wife and Defense Witness
Max Cooper - The Defendant


Note: A cast member’s age can vary greatly and those
portraying witnesses can double with a simple costume change.
Set/Technical Requirements
The set can be quite simple; a judge’s bench (for example a raised podium and bar stool), a bailiff’s box containing a chair, and a witness box containing a chair. In addition two long tables (one for the State Attorneys and one for the Defense Attorneys) are required. There also should be several chairs set up for the Attorneys and the witnesses.
Synopsis
Peter Lambert moved into a tranquil community and soon began terrorizing the neighbors. Max, an upstanding member of the community, found himself in a feud with Peter that escalated to one fateful night that ended with Max shooting Peter in the shoulder, causing Dean Palan, an innocent bystander, to veer off the road and die. Arrested for the attempted murder of Peter Lambert, and the death of poor Dean Palan, Max contends that he “didn’t know the gun was loaded with real bullets” and that his Wife, Savannah, switched the blanks for the real thing. Savannah was outraged by the accusation even though she had a flirtatious reputation and was rumored to have been “involved” with Peter.
The State argues that rage and revenge were involved in this exciting courtroom drama, laced with humor, in which the audience, as the Jury, must deliver the verdict. Three different endings are provided depending on the jury’s outcome.
UNIQUE, INTERACTIVE AND ENGAGING.
21 Actors, Doubling Possible
Many Gender And Age Neutral Roles.
Comments from Patrons
The State vs Max Cooper Production
Tucson, Arizona
February 24, 25, 26, 2010
(All Performances Sold Out with a long waiting list!)
The production was a real winner in many ways; suspenseful, entertaining, fact filled, well cast, a marvelous blend between "serious" and "comical", right length, engaging for the audience, flexible/ adaptive, doable, fun, easily staged, well supplemented with A/V, relatively quick to produce, did NOT take advantage of the audience in a condescending way, . . .
... the production was unique, well written & directed and an altogether fun experience for both of us. Our friends who saw the show commented that they thought the play was written by a professional playwright and adapted for by Steve. When we reminded them that Steve wrote the play, they were very impressed. Involving the audience as the jury made their experience much more enjoyable as they were a part of the play instead of just on-lookers.
Max Cooper had a superb plot (and script), performed sensationally. Thanks for an outstanding play.
What a fun evening! The courtroom drama was a real hoot; the acting was really good and best of all, everyone seemed to be having a great time.
We have just enjoyed one of the best nights of entertainment that we have ever experienced in SaddleBrooke. The writing was terrific, the plot engaged our attention, the actors entertained us with their portrayals, and the production was superb! Can we count on a sequel?
It was very engaging and very well performed. Thanks to everyone involved for a most entertaining and thought provoking evening.
You should be very proud and pleased with your original script. To have written such a detailed and realistic stage play is commendable. Screen play coming up? To get that many people to memorize and deliver so many lines is amazing. The movement on and off stage showed some really good coaching and directing.
We voted to acquit the defendant but my wife held her ground and so did 3 others at our table who found him guilty, which turned out to be the correct verdict. The rest of us were swayed by the long legs and big red hat of the defendant's wife. We loved that the crime took place in our community!
I loved the courtroom format and thought the production was a good blend of drama and comic relief. It provided several conflicts so that the jury could speculate about multiple scenarios that might have led to the shooting. Participating was especially rewarding as every actor and actress had his/her moment in the spotlight. The audience clearly enjoyed the humor and the jury ballots were testimony to the heated discussions that took place about who did what to whom.
I loved the script. It had humor and drama and it was great to see my friends and neighbors bring it to life. It was a wonderful experience for me to be part of this production and judging by the response of the audience every night, they absolutely loved it, especially their own participation as members of the jury. Thank you Susan and Steve Shear for bringing this new format to SaddleBrooke. I hope we will see more productions like it in the future.